You might think it’s a no brainer – after all the devastation caused by the global credit crunch – that property is a no contest winner. You might be right. Your home is the best investment you are likely to have made. In the constant debate over shares versus property, bricks and mortar have won out.
An ANZ review has found the family home has been the highest returning asset over the past 24 years, taking costs, taxes and gearing into account.
Owner-occupied housing outperformed investment property (which still beat shares) largely because of its exemption from capital gains tax. The findings follow a study by RMIT, which also found property has generated better returns than the share market over the past 20 years.
But property investors should take note: the ANZ predicts the stock market will outperform bricks and mortar over the next decade. Even here, though, the bank points out that when the risks associated with each investment are taken into account, the difference between shares and property is likely to be small.
For homeowners this included assuming maintenance costs – rates, insurance and general repairs – were 1.2 per cent of the property’s value. Maintenance costs for investment property were calculated at 1.8 per cent of the dwelling’s value, covering advertising and property management fees.
Stamp duty was applied across the board at 5 per cent. To keep the analysis consistent, cash flow such as rent from investment property or dividends from shares was placed in a term deposit account.
When all the numbers were crunched, owner-occupied housing was found to have generated an annual return of 12 per cent. Investment property 9.6 per cent, stocks 8.9 per cent, government bonds 4.8 per cent, commercial property 4.2 per cent and term deposits 3.7 per cent.
On an average basis, a $100,000 investment in your home in 1987 would be worth $1.428 million today. A similar sum sunk into an investment property would be worth $810,000; although this could be higher of depreciation allowances are significant (for example in the case of near new houses or apartments). what the report fails to acknowledge is the possibilities of LEVERAGE which can magnify your gains in the property market significantly without the need to worry about the volatile share market.
The ANZ expects the ASX 200 to outperform all property over the next 10 years, with returns averaging 7.8 per cent a year, expected. Meanwhile, owner-occupied property is expected to return 7.2 per cent and investment property 4.5 per cent.
The report assumes capital growth in housing will be 5 per cent over the decade, rental yields will average 3 per cent and there will be no major shifts in interest rates.
The good news for property owners is that when the ANZ factored in the risk associated with each investment, they all came out roughly on par.
Having said all this though, you CAN NOT count your home as an investment so this really leaves you with the fact that an investment property can provide a better return than shares… BUT we always think it is wise to have a mix of both thus providing a diversified portfolio and reducing your risk.






Recent Comments
This is just ridiculous, to add another tax on purchasing property! …
The organisations who collect auction data tend to adopt varying geogr …
It's a cool trend i think. It means that people are getting smarter. I …
Hello, I found this website when i was looking for web sites related t …
Real estate investment are always great investments as it is an hedge …